Capitol Police official who said to watch for ‘anti-Trump’ forces on Jan. 6 was deputy chief

The details of Waldow’s transmission come as Congressional investigators attempt to understand the security flaws that allowed the January 6 riot to spiral out of control. Legislature and then Vice President Mike Pence fled on security concerns, resulting in more than 130 Capitol and Capitol violations, and deeply wounding the perception of America’s peaceful transfer of power. The department’s internal watchdog, Inspector General Michael Bolton, has also announced that he intends to check radio communications from that day on.

Bolton has already released damning information about the department’s handling of previous information, suggesting that Donald Trump’s supporters – furiously raged by the outgoing President when he encouraged them to march on Congress and falsely called them ” Stop rigged “election 2020 designated election – a role that could play a threat to the Capitol.

Amid the aftermath, several congressional and Capitol Police sources told POLITICO that a key intelligence official within the department, Jack Donohue, has resigned.

Donohue, who joined the department last year after a 32-year career with the NYPD, left the company for “personal reasons,” a Capitol Police officer told POLITICO on Friday.

Donohue A memo was reportedly sent to the leaders of the Capitol Police on January 3, describing the prospect of violent violence against Congress by Trump supporters who saw January 6 as their last chance to overturn the election results. Steven Sund, who resigned as head of the Capitol Police following the January 6 attack, later told Congress that he had not seen Donahue’s memo and that it never appeared to have reached senior Capitol Police leaders.

“I was told it went to an officer with the rank of sergeant and did not go any further,” Sund said in his testimony dated February 23.

House Democrats fear Waldow’s radio communications suggest officials are still focused on potential street-level skirmishes between Trump allies and anti-Trump protesters, despite the growing threat to lawmakers and officials.

Capitol Police leaders have largely defended their actions and preparations for January 6, despite acknowledging mistakes that have led to disastrous results. Sund and his successor, incumbent chief Yogananda Pittman, said the secret service never broached the possibility of a mob attack that would threaten the Capitol itself. They found that intelligence had still sent pence to the Capitol that day, suggesting that the intelligence would never have done so if the threat of an attempted insurrection had been established.

But the common officers had been furious with their leadership since the attack. Many said they felt completely underprepared for the vicious attack they were exposed to. The department’s union delivered resounding results Voices of suspicion to Pittman and other Capitol Police leaders in February. Waldow did better than most of the others and received 64 percent disapproval.

Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., First revealed – without naming him – Waldow’s radio communications during a hearing last week in which she raised concerns that the Capitol Police leadership appeared to be anti-focused on the morning of Jan. 6 – Rather trump protesters than the concerted attack on the Capitol that was about to unfold. Though Lofgren initially indicated that the radio transmission suggested officers do it just Focus on anti-Trump characters, the transcript of the broadcast is more nuanced.

“With regard to pedestrian traffic on today’s premises, we expect a large presence for Pro-Trump participants,” Waldow beamed his colleagues according to the drafting of the guideline. “What we’re looking for is an anti.” -Trump Counter Protesters. ”

After Lofgren revealed Waldow’s instruction, the Capitol Police publicly pushed back, released the verbatim text of the transmission, and suggested that Lofgren had taken it out of context. The department said Waldow’s comment was intended to indicate that officials should keep in mind that anti-Trump protesters in the crowd would likely create hotspots for possible clashes with Trump-allied protesters – a dynamic that played out during protests in November and December would have.

“The radio call was misquoted and it lacks a full and necessary context,” the department said in a long statement. “The radio call doesn’t mean that USCP was only looking for anti-Trump counter-protesters.” The next radio broadcast tells officials to look out for a pro-Trump protester carrying a possible weapon. … The USCP’s mission is to protect Congress so that it can fulfill its constitutional and legislative responsibilities. “

Waldow’s radio transmission is not the only aspect of his actions investigated on January 6th. His Decision to wade into the crowd of extremists As the fighting intensified – a decision that earned him the praise of some fellow officers – it nonetheless disrupted communications for the officers on the ground, as he was their main coordinator. The common officers have complained that no other leaders intervened to help coordinate while Waldow was involved in the fighting.

Without identifying Waldow, Pittman extensively addressed this communication disruption during his testimony before the House Appropriations Committee in February, admitting that “incident command protocols were not being followed.”

“Those responsible for our civil disruption department and the operational commanders responsible for the Capitol are responsible for implementing this command system,” said Pittman. “So if there is a breakdown, look for these commanders.” with boots on the ground to give this instruction. This did not happen primarily because these operational commanders were so overwhelmed by the time that they began to get involved and help the officers with boots on instead of giving this guidance and instruction. “

Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) Pushed Pittman back, wondering why senior Capitol Police officers stationed at the command center didn’t step in to regain control once communications broke down. She asked if Pittman believed these local commanders were responsible for the collapse.

“I think it’s a multilevel mistake, if you will,” Pittman replied.

January 6th wasn’t the first time Waldow’s behavior was reviewed. He was also at the center of a controversy surrounding the firing of a Capitol police officer who complained about sexual harassment by a manager. Waldow, then an inspector, recommended that the officer Chrisavgi Sourgoutsis be dismissed later admitted he violated the department’s protocol by not meeting with their manager before making his recommendation.

Leave a Comment