“I am honestly tired of every time our police system fails. The first answer is that we give them more money,” Omar said in an interview.
Omar, a longtime advocate of police reform, said she saw flaws in the “readiness and procedures of the police and lack of political will” to stop the rioters on Jan. 6.
“I don’t see how the supplement addresses that,” she said.
Omar is one of several Democrats who has raised questions about possible extremism within the ranks of the Capitol Police Dozens of officers were examinedand several suspended without pay as part of an investigation into the January 6 riot.
In a joint statement released later Thursday, Bush, Omar and Pressley said they voted against the legislation because it did not allocate enough resources to advise and treat staff and allocate more resources to a police system they believed after was in need of reform. “This bill prioritizes more money for a broken system that has long perpetuated and protected the violence of the white supremacists we saw that day,” they said. According to members, the bill had to address the “organized and violent white supremacy, radicalization and disinformation” that led to the attack.
Bowman said the January 6 attack “was not due to a lack of police funding” and that Capitol officials should “investigate those involved in the attack.”
“Putting billions more into policing does not achieve that goal,” he said.
Democrats had little warning that there would be problems with the bill. On Wednesday there were concerns for the first time that forced the Democratic whip team to take the temperature of their members again that night. The violent backlash from the Liberals took some members of the leadership by surprise, according to several sources.
Progressives had also tried to ensure that Capitol employees outside of the Convention Bureau were paid fairly as part of the finance bill.
“I think they really voted based on what they saw was right,” said Pramila Jayapal, Washington MP, who heads the Progressive Caucus of Congress and endorses the bill.
“We got a yes at the end of the day because the members understood that there were some very good, important parts in the bill,” said Jayapal.
The Funding Bill, one of the Democrats’ biggest steps to date to respond to the insurgency, is unlikely to move quickly in the Senate, where GOP leaders have contested some of its provisions and complained that Democrats passed the bill inadequately Their party’s contribution.
Democrats say the money is badly needed, especially the tens of millions more for the Capitol Police, a force that was understaffed long before the attack fell ill-treated. The Capitol Police are facing a moral crisis that lawmakers intend to address with back payments for overtime, hazard payments, and retention bonuses, along with more equipment and better training.
The move also includes long-term contingency planning elements such as the creation of a new Rapid Response Team that would essentially create a permanent DC National Guard force, many of which have been stationed at the Capitol for months.
Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan, chief democrat of the sub-panel that funds the Capitol Police, recognized the importance of “reform” in the structure of the armed forces, but defended the importance of increasing preparedness, especially after Jan. 6.
“We can’t have an exodus of our cops being hit on the head by a lead pipe,” said Ryan, referring to a weapon used by insurgents against Capitol police officers.
Democrats, according to multiple sources, had expected a handful of Republicans to support the bill, but that GOP support vanished when Democrats began to have voting issues on their side.
Every Republican ultimately voted no, as recommended by their leadership – a far cry from the 35 GOP lawmakers who opposed their party to support a panel that investigated the January 6th events the day before.
One of the GOP’s main complaints is that the Democrats are too quick to process the bill. Several Republicans have also complained that the new Rapid Response Team would fall under the control of the Guard rather than the Capitol Police.
“If I decide today to move this bill forward, I am concerned that my colleagues will be more interested in making headlines than making progress,” said Republican MP Kay Granger, Republican chief on the Budgets Committee.
Democrats counter that they must act quickly to secure the Capitol, where a massive fence has encircled the inner perimeter since the Jan. 6 attack. However, they say that few other necessary security improvements – like stronger doors and windows or more cameras – can be done without additional funds.
“We all sit in this chamber and live with the violent attack on our democracy and our lives. We must act now to meet our commitments and our oath of office, ”said Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.), Chair of Home Remedies, before the vote.
The bill also includes around $ 22 million to protect members of Congress who have seen more than twice as many personal threats against them after the uprising. Many, especially Democrats and Republicans, who publicly clashed with former President Donald Trump have paid out of pocket or with campaign money to improve their personal safety.
In addition, the legislation would provide reimbursement for Capitol Police and National Guard troops who have helped secure the Capitol and allocated millions of dollars for future security improvements. It would also bolster and rename the Capitol Police wellness center for the late officer Howard Liebengood, who died of suicide in the days following the attack.
In response to legislature’s criticism of the fences around the Capitol, the legislation bans the use of its security devices for permanent barriers, but allows retractable fences to be created in the future.
Capitol architect Brett Blanton wrote to the property management committee Wednesday that his office would issue “initial recommendations in the coming weeks” from assessing the needs of the Capitol complex. This assessment would include a “physical security” assessment. needs like fencing.