Why are some people cruel to people who don’t even pose a threat to them – sometimes even to their own children? Where does this behavior come from and what is its purpose? Ruth, 45, London.
Man is the fame and the dregs of the universe, concluded the French philosopher. Blaise Pascal, in 1658. Little has changed. We love and we hate; we help and we harm; We reach out a hand and insert the knife.
We understand when someone hits in retaliation or in self-defense. But when someone harms the harmless, we ask, “How could you?”
People usually do things for pleasure or to avoid pain. For most of us, hurting others leads us to feel their pain. And we don’t like that feeling. This suggests two reasons why humans can harm the harmless – either them Not feel the pain of the other or them enjoy feel the pain of others.
Another reason people harm the harmless is because they see a threat nonetheless. Someone who doesn’t put your body or wallet at risk can put your social status at risk. This helps explain otherwise puzzling actions, such as when people harm others who help them financially.
This article is part of The big questions in life
The new series of the conversation, co-published with BBC Future, seeks to answer the nagging questions our readers have about life, love, death and the universe. We work with professional researchers who have spent their lives discovering new perspectives on the issues that shape our lives.
Sadists and psychopaths
The popular fantasy associates sadism with torturers and murderers. However, there is also the less extreme but more common phenomenon of everyday sadism.
Everyday sadists take pleasure in hurting others or watching them suffer. you should enjoy bloody movies, find fighting exciting and torture interesting. They are rare, but not rare enough. Around 6% of the students admit taking pleasure in hurting others.
The everyday sadist can Internet troll or a School bullies. In online role-playing games, they are likely the “grief” who spoils the game for others. Everyday sadists are attracted to them violent computer games. And the more they play The more sadistic they get.
Unlike sadists, psychopaths don’t harm the harmless just because they enjoy it (though You can). Psychopaths want things. If it helps them harm others to get what they want, so be it.
This is a seriously dangerous set of skills. For millennia, humanity has domesticated. This has made it difficult for many of us to harm others. It will be many who harm, torture, or kill haunted by experience. But psychopathy is one powerful predictor from someone engaging in unprovoked violence.
We need to know if we’re going to run into a psychopath. We can make a good guess just by looking at them someone’s face or briefly interact with them. Unfortunately, psychopaths know we know that. You fight back Work hard on their clothing and grooming to make a great first impression.
But not all psychopaths are dangerous. Antisocial psychopaths can seek thrills from drugs or dangerous activities. However, prosocial psychopaths Find your thrill in the fearless pursuit of new ideas. As innovations shape our societiesProsocial psychopaths can change the world for all of us. However, this can be for both good and bad.
Where do these properties come from?
Italian philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli once suggested that “The times, not men, create disorder”. In line with this, neuroscience suggests that sadism could be a survival tactic triggered by difficult times. When certain foods become scarce, our levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin, fall. This fall makes us more willing to harm others because Damage becomes more comfortable.
Psychopathy can also be an adaptation. Some studies have linked higher levels of psychopathy greater fertility. Still others have found the opposite. The reason for this may be that psychopaths specifically have a reproductive advantage harsh environments.
Indeed, psychopathy can thrive in unstable, competitive worlds. The skills of psychopaths make them master manipulators. Their impulsiveness and lack of fear help them take risks and make short-term gains. In the movie Wall Street The psychopath Gordon Gekko makes millions. Although psychopathy can be a benefit in the corporate worldonly offers it to men a slim leading edge.
Psychopathy’s connection to creativity can also explain its survival. The mathematician Eric Weinstein generally argues that uncomfortable people drive innovation. However, if your environment supports creative thinking, Disagreement is less related to creativity. The beautiful can be new.
There is a moderate to large hereditary component to these properties. Some people may just be born this way. Alternatively, high D-factor Parents could pass these traits on on their children by abusing them. Similar, seeing others behaving with high D-factor can teach us to do so. We all have a role to play in reducing cruelty.
Fear and dehumanization
Sadism involves enjoying another person Humiliation and pain. Yet that is often said Dehumanize people is what allows us to be cruel. Potential victims are classified as dogs, lice, or cockroaches, which supposedly makes it easier for others to harm them.
There is something to it. Research shows that when someone breaks a social norm, our brains Treat their faces as less human. This makes it easier for us to punish people who violate norms of behavior.
It’s a sweet feeling to think we won’t hurt someone when we see them as human. It is also a dangerous delusion. Psychologist Paul Bloom argues that our worst atrocities could be based on this Not Dehumanize people. People can hurt others precisely because they recognize them as human who do not want to suffer pain, humiliation or degradation.
For example, the NSDAP dehumanized the Jewish people by calling them on Bugs and lice. But that’s also why the Nazis humiliated, tortured and murdered Jews, precisely because They saw them as people Who would be demoted and suffer such treatment?
Do-go or exemption
Sometimes people even harm the helpful. Imagine playing one economic game in which you and other players have the opportunity to invest in a group fund. The more money that is deposited, the more it pays out. And the fund pays out money to all players regardless of whether they have invested or not.
At the end of the game, you can pay to penalize other players for how much they invested. To do this, you give up part of your income and the money will be taken away from the player of your choice. In short, you can be malicious.
Some players have punished others for investing little or nothing in the group fund. However, some will pay to punish players who invested More in the group fund than they did. Such actions don’t seem to make sense. Generous players give you a bigger payout – why should you stop them?
This phenomenon is known as the “do-gooder exception”. It can be found all over the world. Hunters are successful in hunter-gatherer societies criticized for catching a large animal although catching them means everyone gets more meat. Hillary Clinton Do-Go or may have received an exception as a result of their rights-based US presidential campaign in 2016.
Do-go or exemption exists because of our counter-dominant tendencies. A less generous player in the above economy game might feel that a more generous player will seen by others as a preferred employee. The more generous person threatens to become dominant. As the French writer Voltaire put it, the best is the enemy of the good.
Still, there is a hidden benefit to the do-gooder exemption. As soon as we pull down the maker, it’s us more open to their message. One study found that being allowed to express an aversion to vegetarians led to them becoming less supportive of eating meat. If the messenger is shot, crucified, or not elected, it can lead to his message being accepted.
The future of cruelty
In the movie Whiplash, a music teacher uses cruelty to promote greatness in one of his students. We can withdraw from such tactics. But the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed we had done it to be averse to such cruelty.
For NietzscheCruelty allowed one teacher to burn one criticism into another for the good of the other person. People could also be cruel to themselves in order to become who they wanted to be. Nietzsche believed that cruelty could help develop courage, perseverance, and creativity. Should we be more willing to let others and ourselves suffer in order to develop virtue?
Probably not. We now know the potentially appalling long-term effects of the cruelty of others, including harm to both physically and Mental health. The Benefits of compassion for yourself, instead of treating themselves cruelly, are also increasingly recognized.
Teaching through cruelty invites abuse of power and selfish sadism. However, Buddhism offers an alternative – angry compassion. Here we act out of love to confront others and to protect them from their greed, hate and fear. Life can be cruel, the truth can be cruel, but we can choose not to be.
Join the hundreds of thousands of people who value evidence-based messages from for all of life’s important answers Subscribe to our newsletter. You can email us your big questions at [email protected] We will try to find a researcher or an expert for the case.
More The big questions in life::