Matt Reeves explained why he treated “Batman” as a separate movie

Matt Reeves described in detail how he treated “Batman” as a separate film, and sequels and spin-offs were not considered a guarantee.

Matt Reeves explained his approach to “Batman” as a separate film and doesn’t take the potentially inevitable sequels and spin-offs for granted. Matt Reeves’ new take on “The Caped Crusader” was a box office and critical success, and it turned out that the wait was worth it after several delays caused by the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. Fans have praised new interpretations of characters such as Batman (Robert Pattinson), Catwoman (Zoe Kravitz), Penguin (Colin Farrell), and Riddler (Paul Dano) that come as close as possible to their final cinematic versions compared to previous adaptations.

With this level of success, fans have already had many reasons to think about the continuation of “Batman”. A spin-off series dedicated to “Penguin” has already been green-lighted for HBO Max, where Pharrell will reprise his role as Oswald Cobblepot, and the “Arkham” series is also in active development. While nothing official has been announced yet, it seems inevitable that a full-fledged Batman sequel is also on the way, and Reeves seems to have quite a few ideas for Batman 2.

In an interview with the LA Times, Reeves spoke at length about how he treated “Batman” as a separate feature film and didn’t pay much attention to potential sequels. After thinking about what creative control Reeves was given in this new version, the director was asked what further ideas he had for expanding the world he embodied on screen. Reeves responded by saying that he didn’t approach the film with the assumption that everything was still ahead, and focused on telling a closed story that would ensure the new Dark Knight itself would be a worthy addition to the canon. Check out his full quote below:

“When making the film, I always felt like I would never consider it the first chapter because the first chapter suggests there are more chapters. I wanted to make this movie an enjoyable experience so that people could have a new experience. a version – a new version – of a character that they loved, you know, people – that the world has loved for over 80 years, and i think if we succeed in this, i know i have a lot of stories i want and then we’ll do a second chapter, but not because we haven’t completed this part.”

Reeves’ comments show the director’s desire to outline the building blocks of his new universe before considering future pairings. Batman himself was originally envisioned as a very different project, originally billed as taking place in the Expanded DC Universe and as a solo outing for Ben Affleck’s Batman, which the actor was to write and direct. The project was then handed over to Reeves, who continued to make a film at the DCEU starring Affleck while the actor and Warner Bros. were on their way. they didn’t spread and Reeves took full creative control with a full rethink. As part of this process, Reeves may not have taken the safety of making a movie in a popular, established franchise for granted and focused on making Batman a standalone film that audiences would love to see more of. †

Despite this, Batman sequels are on the way, and fans are speculating on how they might see the world of the new Caped Crusader expand in the coming years. The Penguin series will shed more light on Farrell’s Cobblepot and possibly move on to Gotham’s underworld and the Drops racket the character was involved in. dedicated to a feature film or that have already received numerous incarnations in the cinema, such as “The Joker” by Barry Keoghan. Viewers also have a long list of requirements for Batman 2, from a story dedicated to sinister villains like the Court of Owls or Mr. Freeze to take on Robin as Batman’s little friend. Whatever happens in the future, fans can appreciate that Reeves has shown the foresight to build a solid foundation with Batman, rather than being distracted by elaborate plans for the future.

Leave a Comment