Tennis star Novak Djokovic’s appeal in court in Melbourne, Australia has ruled that the player should be removed from the Park Hotel in Carlton during the hearing, while Judge Anthony Kelly has voiced his excitement over the rejection of Djokovic’s medical exception.
The Australian Federal District Court hears Djokovic’s appeal against the decision to deny him a visa before the Australian Open.
The court issued an order requiring Djokovic to be picked up from the Park Hotel during the hearing and taken to “an area specified by the applicant’s lawyers”.
The injunction states: “The defendant, through its servants or agents, including the Australian Border Forces, will take all steps and whatever is necessary to obtain the applicant in the proceedings given by its lawyers on Monday the 10th and each day thereafter, including the pronouncement of the verdict). to allow him to remain there until the end of each hearing and to ensure his safe return to detention after each hearing is complete. “
After the hearing was delayed due to technical issues with the court’s video link, Djokovic’s attorneys began hearing their case with Judge Kelly, who asked the court, “What more could this man have done?” and said he was “excited” about the subject.
“Here a professor and a highly qualified doctor presented and granted the applicant a medical exemption,” said Judge Kelly.
“In addition, this medical exemption and the basis on which it was issued were separately issued by another independent panel of experts set up by the Victorian state government, and that document was in the hands of the delegate.”
Djokovic’s attorney Nicholas Wood has argued that the letter of intent to cancel the visa was flawed because it was made for “a confusing mixture of two reasons”.
He also argued that Djokovic was treated at the airport as if access to lawyers would “impossible” help in the matter.
Judicial documents presented by Djokovic’s lawyers revealed that the ace contracted Covid-19 in December 2021. The documents say the infection was the basis for Djokovic’s medical exception.
The documents also found that Djokovic expressed “shock, surprise and confusion” when he was informed of his visa cancellation “as (as he understood it) he had done everything that was necessary to enter Australia” .
But the Australian Home Office filed court documents stating that “there is no assurance that a non-citizen will enter Australia” and that the minister has the power to cancel Djokovic’s visa a second time if the court rules in his favor .
“As the Court pointed out on an earlier reference with the parties, it is up to the defendant to administer the law in accordance with the law when that court is issuing orders in favor of the applicant. This may result in the delegate deciding whether to make another annulment decision, but the law also includes other powers as the court knows. “
More stories from where you live can be found at Near you.