Trump and McConnell Are Undoing the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Legitimacy

0
11
trump-mcconnell-white-house-gty-img

Much has been said about Judge Amy Coney Barrett’s qualifications and controversy – and there will be much more to come. However, the real story of the Supreme Court is not about Donald Trump’s youngest candidate. The real story is a nomination process that, if it goes as expected, robs an already discredited court of the constitutional legitimacy it retains.

It doesn’t matter who Trump nominated. If a candidate was confirmed in the last few weeks of an election campaign in which The American people might well give a mandate to a new president and control of the Senate – or in the weeks following an election that leads to such an outcome – the court’s credibility is compromised.

This clear perspective should frame any discussion of what Richard Blumenthal, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, aptly calls “this illegitimate sham trial. Efforts to circumvent the will of the people are the main issue for a country where the government – including the judiciary – is supposed to derive its just powers from the “consent of the governed”.

The people have never given this president or Senate the power to make the nation’s Supreme Court the platform for right-wing rights activism that Trump and McConnell seek.

Donald Trump lost the 2016 election with 2.9 million votes. He just secured himself 46.1 percent of the voteversus 48.2 percent for the Democrat Hillary Clinton. In each of the three states the electoral college presented to the Republican candidate, the majority of voters cast their ballots for someone other than Trump – in Wisconsin, 54 percent of voters rejected him; in Michigan, 53 percent rejected him; In Pennsylvania, 53 percent rejected it. He assumed the presidency without a mandate.

But four years after that mandate was denied, this president is making his third nomination to the United States Supreme Court. If Barrett is confirmed, the Supreme Court will be converted. An iconic liberal, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, is replaced by a conservative extremist, Barrett, and the unspoken equilibrium that existed will give way to right-wing rigidity. “This is a transformative appointment,” said Neal Katyal, a former acting attorney general in the United States, who notes that Trump’s two previous decisions, by Judges Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, were conservatives, replacing a conservative and a moderate conservative. “This is really moving from one side of the spectrum to the other.”

Barrett who served only three years The US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is said to be initiated by the confirmatory trial of Mitch McConnell, the Kentucky Republican who runs a “majority caucus” representing a minority of Americans. Of the 100 senators53 Republicans represent states home to 153.5 million Americans while 47 Democrats (and independents who meet with them) represent 168.5 million Americans. In the last round of the Senate elections in 201852,260,651 voters cast their votes for Democrats, while only 34,723,013 Republicans voted. In 2016When most Americans rejected Trump, 51,496,682 voters cast their votes for Democrats, while only 40,402,790 Republicans voted. In fact, by election cycles since 2000, the Democrats have won the most votes for the Senate in seven. The Republicans won the most votes in just three.

.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here