The White House said he was later released.
The fall of the Labor Office’s chief attorney before the end of his term in November follows Democratic criticism of the direction many management has taken in recent years.
Democrats have also raised concerns about Robb’s efforts to reorganize some regional governance offices and new guidelines for government investigations.
Robb has substantial control over the cases the Board considers in its role in overseeing investigations and charges against companies suspected of violating the National Labor Relations Act.
The NLRB is an independent federal agency tasked with enforcing U.S. labor law related to labor practices and collective agreements.
A top house democrat called Biden’s move “a great victory for American workers”.
Virginia Rep. Bobby Scott, chairman of the House Education and Labor Committee, praised the decision, arguing that Robb “has consistently neglected his legal duty to uphold the right of workers to stand together and negotiate for better working conditions.”
The National Right to Work Foundation, an anti-union group, criticized Biden’s actions as “exactly the opposite of a return to the” normal “”.
NLRB spokesman Kevin Petroccione informed POLITICO in an email that the board had no comments.
Democrats have also raised concerns about possible conflicts of interest between Trump-appointed board members and their former clients. House Democrats summoned the board last year over documents relating to alleged conflicts in one country top-class Unfair labor practice case against McDonald’s Corp. in which Robb played a role.
The case was brought by the Obama-era NLRB, which alleged the fast food giant was responsible for labor violations by its franchisees.
Robb was looking for a place to stay by doing McDonald’s caseon the grounds that a business-friendly decision about the joint employment, which became available later, called into question the claims against the fast-food giant.
This case, Hy-Brand industrial companywas overturned by the NLRB after a general report from the inspector stated that board member William Emanuel should not have participated in the decision given his former law firm’s involvement in a previous joint employer case that the 2017 ruling overturned.
The dispute sparked outrage among Democrats, who raised concerns about conflicts of interest with the Labor Board.
Said Robb At the time he “disagreed with the opinions reached in the IG report”.